Wednesday, 27 November 2013

RED 2 Challenging my current practices



R.E.D 2
Challenging my current practice
When I looked at the assignment brief  I knew exactly  what RED 1 would be straight away and I knew that If there was any certain way to  ensure that RED2 does what it needed to do and that is to be everything that RED 1 isn't. I knew that I had to create something that  so far removed from what RED 1 was that you may wonder if I had made the film at all. This meant I had to go from conceiving a story with a beginning middle and end, working in locations and using actors to construct a  film with no actors , no locations and no sense of a conventional story.
Essentially looking back at my work, I haven't really "said" anything, there's something of a directorial identity to be seen but I there's nothing about my work that really makes a statement or comments on anything, My films may give the audience the impression that I like comedy, which I do, but there is nothing in my work which gives a portrayal of my world view. I decided to go for the darkest, bleakest subject matter I possibly could and use this film as a way of creating a mood, a feeling, a tone. I wanted this film to be anything but about a story or a conventional outcome.
Maybe I had chosen to try and hide behind absurdist humour and  not reveal my ideas, in fear that they may upset or disgust others, My intention is never to purposefully upset people, I don't think that should ever be a goal with art, but I almost wanted to present something that would almost be an amplifier for my darkest, bleakest, most nihilistic  thoughts.  I literally wanted to show something that was said something about me  and how I see the world when I see it at its worst. As far as I was concerned it needed to be the inversion of RED 1, that was how I understood the brief. I had to actually challenge myself and my practices and as dramatic as it sounds, I had to challenge myself  If I was ever to come out the other end as a better film-maker.
I would have to primarily rely on editing equipment for me to make my film and I knew that If I was going to make the film that I had in my head I needed to sit in the edit suite for as long as it took to create the images that I wanted. I almost need to push myself in situations where there is no other outcome, otherwise I would just back away. Although I did capture some footage from a car passenger window the exact same day as when I shot the footage for RED 1, Most of my media would be from other sources,  mostly from the internet, and from films that I had seen before, where the dialogue or images struck me as being important. I decided to re-appropriate the footage that I picked and the audio  and that I would mix them together and against each other in such a way that the audience would be trapped and almost oppressed by it. I knew to do this successfully that I would need to learn how to edit correctly and precisely, every cut should be important and intentional, because that's where the message , the heart of the film resides, If I failed to cut , even a frame , the way I wanted to, I would feel like I had failed.

R.E.D. 1 Research Materials



R.E.D.1

Research Materials

As the first part of this project was about looking at my current practice I looked back at all my films and tried to identify the things about them that I liked and that I considered said something about me as a film- maker. I also took a look at the script-writing research that I had conducted as part of my " Film Arts Specialism" module last year 





I also looked into films which had utilized short shooting schedules in limited locations.


















I did some research into the equipment to make sure that I used the most appropriate camera for the shoot. i used a 600D because I find it fairly labour saving and mobile, you can view what you have just shot and then erase takes even then the battery life and memory space should allow for a lot of takes and extra footage if needed, I was more concerned about the script and the performances of the actors than communicating a visual style, so I used what was I considered the best camera for the job.

R.E.D. 1 Post- Production



R.E.D. 1

Post- Production 


Robbie was kind enough to help me through the editing process with me, in fact it has become a habit of mine to enlist the help of someone else to  do the work and for me to oversee and give directions, Robbie has had a lot of experience with editing and the accompanying technology  so the process was a very smooth one relatively free from stress, I did take over the reins a little bit towards the end of the process more out of necessity than anything else as Robbie was working on his own film elsewhere. I generally find editing the most laborious  aspect of the production, technology in general tends to frustrate me and I am always afraid that the computer will suddenly shut down and I will lose all my work.

During this process I was able to learn a couple of things that were able to help me finish the credits for the film and also make an accompanying " gag reel ". I felt a bit frustrated that I had not retained the information about the edit suites and how to use them as so many other of my peers had done and I really felt that I needed to start learning how to use them properly soon or I felt that it could be to my detriment, for example: there were several instances during the editing process where I could not export the files correctly, due to me not setting up the projects appropriately.

Overall  I felt what was positive about the project were all the aspects of my practices which I had already developed, I just felt that they were stronger on this film than before, I think that my control and my idea of what the film should be made for a short, enjoyable shoot. Although the post - production yet again highlighted the weaknesses  that I developed in my working methods and they had become ever more apparent, this was something that I was to address and confront in the second part of my project, R.E.D. 2.

RED 1 Production



R.E.D. 1
Production 

 I wanted to try and  keep the production to a single day, as I wanted as much time as possible to edit the film.  I had everyone involved in the film meet me at my house where I was able to present the script to the crew members although my principal actor, Martin, had already been sent the script
the easiest thing for me to do was to shoot the scenes in sequence rather than hop back and forth. I understand the benefits of shooting that way on a bigger  and longer production schedule, but since that this was just a short few scenes, I felt it would be best to just go though the scenes step by step.  I  found myself paying particular attention to Martin  as he had no prior acting experience, I tried to communicate exactly what I was after in the performance without pressuring him too much to get it right on the first take. Initially he was very nervous and uncomfortable, he struggled with the material, I had to get a few  re-takes at the start. As we got further into the shoot, he relaxed and found his feet, to the point where some exchanges only required one take.
Unfortunately there was a minor equipment problem as the multi-directional microphone  wasn't working, thankfully the weather was mild with little wind, so as long as  the shots were fairly tight I could get Ciaran,  who was in charge of sound , to keep the zoom  sound recorder fairly close to Martin and myself.  Robbie was operating the camera on the shoot, I had never worked with him before, he made some good suggestions as far as staging  the scenes and finding where to get the best shots. Towards the end he was wanting more and more takes to work with but I was insisting that we get exactly what  was necessary as we were starting to lose the light.
Thankfully I got exactly what I wanted on the day and I certainly enjoyed shooting the film,  I really felt "at home" working this way, It was evident  that I really enjoyed being able to make something that was both simple independent of any  academic requirements, meaning that I didn't have to  create a film in a certain style  or using a method that was decided by my superiors. I understand how this freedom can paradoxically intimidate other film-makers but I really enjoyed it.

RED 1 My Current Practices



R.E.D. 1
My Current Practices
My previous work could be defined as being very conventional in narrative and direction, I  think that I demonstrate a certain directorial presence in my work, that is to say that I think my films feel solid and coherent in terms of story  and I think you can see the level of control that I exert over my projects.
Certainly as my confidence has grown,  you can see my work becoming increasingly idiosyncratic. For example my first project "Jeefs" was much  more of a collaboration between myself and my partner although I would say that I had less input on  story and construction than if did on locations. whereas my last film " Capture the Rabbit " was very much a product of my own design, whether or not this is a positive aspect remains to be seen.
What I decided to take from my experiences of making " Capture the Rabbit " was  my willingness to direct  and construct, I looked another one of my films " The Walking Test"  and  I knew that I could write something humorous and I could get performances from relatively in-experienced actors especially as I had decided that I would play one of the parts myself, this would give me the opportunity to help support the other actor/actors. My  experience in writing scripts meant that I knew exactly how  the film to come across  to an audience, thus hopefully demonstrating my own  practices and working methods.


( Jeefs 2011 Dir. Dorian Cozens/Daniel Bache )


( The Walking Test 2011 Dir. Daniel Bache )